BAM!
BAM!

Bread and Circus by Airea D. Matthews

Book Review: Bread and Circus by Airea D. Matthews

By Beth Brown Preston

As I was privileged to attend the Class of 1974’s 50th reunion at Bryn Mawr College, my alma mater, I found myself considering a Black woman poet’s sojourn on that gorgeous suburban campus. As I recalled old times with former classmates, the poet whose name came to my mind was Airea D. Matthews—associate professor and co-director of the Creative Writing Program at Bryn Mawr.

On the same day as my reunion, I decided to purchase her recent collection of poems titled Bread and Circus. I was totally amazed by her achievement as a scholar and poet in this second published volume of hers; her first book of poetry, Simulacra, won the 2016 Yale Series of Younger Poets award.

The title of this collection is selected from the phrase “bread and circus” that appears in the Satires of the Roman poet Juvenal (“Satura X” – A.D. 100). In translation from Latin, the passage reads, “Long ago they have thrown overboard all anxiety. For that sovereign people that once gave away military command, consulships, legions, and every thing, now bridles its desires, and limits its anxious longings to two things only – bread, and the games of the circus!” (p. 92). The ruling class, the people in power, can only be appeased with frivolities and pleasures.

The poet, in this brilliant and probing collection, interfaces life experience with the works of the Scottish economist and moral philosopher Adam Smith (1723-1790), who is known as the “Father of Capitalism,” and with the writings of Guy Debord (1931-1994). Debord was a founding member of the Situationist International, an organization “composed of interdisciplinary libertarian Marxists, who posited that in late-stage capitalism social relations…would deteriorate and be mediated through objects – products that one can buy, sell, or fetishize…” (p. 91).

In her “Notes and Sources,” Matthews writes, “Smith forwarded the invisible hand theory in which self-interest was at the heart of a thriving economy – people would help one another economically because it was in their best interest. The belief in self-interest is the basis of modern free-market capitalism” (p. 91).

Matthews’ poetic achievement emerges in her timely criticism of our capitalist society, a system that depends largely upon the exchange of commodities for its economic progress. As capitalism evolves, she argues, “the body itself becomes a fetishized commodity.” Her argument is presented with and supported by the works of social theorists and our modern behaviorists (e.g. Pavlov and B.F. Skinner), and through her poems of lived experience as the child of a working-class family.

Matthews gives her readers several portraits of an errant father—a man who has failed his wife and children with his frequent absence, his gambling, and his heroin addiction. In a poem called “Swindle,” she describes a scene in which a father takes his child with him to a poker game to watch him lose the family’s meager funds in an unlucky bet. In a prose poem, “The Family Room in ‘79,” the poet extols a mother who is dutiful despite her bad marriage and economic circumstances: “Before there was a room, there was a family. That family had a mother. That mother’s children called her Mama” (p. 15). This woman is beaten by her husband in front of her children, when he arrives home to find the children dining on food donated to his family by a charity.

These and other scenes of urban violence paint the reality of the Black working-class family as victims of the greed-oriented capitalist system that preys on their neighborhoods with indecent housing, poor schools, and illegal drugs. Black bodies and minds are pictured as commodified by marriage, debt, eviction, and a series of common urban tragedies and deaths.

This second collection has been called “ardently interactive” by other reviewers for exploring canonical texts by Adam Smith and Guy Debord “to critique the impact of capitalism beyond the theoretical.” In a poem titled “The Troubles,” the poet describes the horrific scene of a political revolution in Europe while paralleling this event with the troubled occasion of a child’s birth, perhaps her own birth, to a reluctant mother who “thousands of miles away/ on a different continent,/ wailing on her bedroom floor,/ arms flailed across her belly,/ mourning an unwanted/ who spine-swims against her/backbone’s curve/ holding vigil for blood/ that will not come and/ one who surely will” (p. 7). Matthews predicts the coming of a new class of poet-revolutionaries, the youth of her generation, whose birth heralds a time for change.